Abstract
BackgroundOssification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) may increase the risk of spinal cord injury (SCI) with various neurological deficits after minor trauma. However, few studies have investigated the influence of OPLL on neurological outcome after acute cord injury. We examined whether severe spinal canal stenosis caused by OPLL affects neurological outcome after SCI based on intramedullary signal intensity (SI) changes on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).MethodsFrom June 2006 to July 2013, we treated 246 patients with cervical cord injury. Fifty-one (20.7 %) patients had ventral cord compression due to OPLL without any bony fractures. Among them, 38 patients (34 men, mean age 62.7 years) underwent cervical laminoplasty (8) and cervical decompression and fixation (30). The neurologic assessments were performed in patients who had 1-year follow-up, and the mean follow-up period was 42.2 months. OPLL type, cause of injury, cervical sagittal angle, cervical spine stenosis, cord compression ratio (space available for the spinal cord (SAC)), and grade of intramedullary SI (grade 0, none; grade 1, light; grade 2, intense T2WI) were assessed.ResultsMean American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) motor score at admission was 38.4 ± 21.9 (range, 2–70) and improved to 67.7 ± 19.1 (range, 8–94) at last follow-up (p < 0.05). Mean recovery rate of the motor score was 55.8 ± 19.9 %. Five patients had SI grade 0, 20 patients had SI grade 1, and 13 patients had SI grade 2. Among the variables tested, age, initial ASIA motor grade, intramedullary SI grade, and SAC were significantly related to neurological outcome. However, initial cervical alignment, canal diameter, length of SI, time interval between injury and operation, and OPLL type had no significant effect on neurological outcome.ConclusionsPreoperative neurological status, cord compression ratio, and SI grade are related to neurological outcome in patients with SCI associated with OPLL. The better the preoperative neurological status, the more favorable the neurological outcome after surgery. A higher SI grade on preoperative T2WI was negatively related to neurological outcome. Therefore, the severity of SI change, cord compression ratio, and preoperative neurological status can be regarded as significant prognostic factors in patients with SCI associated with OPLL.
Highlights
Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) is a common cervical disease that can cause stenotic changes in the spinal canal and contribute to the development of quadriparesis
Some authors reported that patients with increased intramedullary signal intensity (SI) based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) had a poor prognosis after surgical decompression, while others found no clear relationship between SI and prognosis after surgery [3, 5,6,7,8,9]
Most cases of the cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) complicated by OPLL are caused by hyperextension injuries resulting from falling or slipping down injuries
Summary
Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) is a common cervical disease that can cause stenotic changes in the spinal canal and contribute to the development of quadriparesis. OPLL has been found in about 30 % of patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) [1, 2] These results indicate that OPLL is a major risk factor for developing acute cervical SCI. Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) may increase the risk of spinal cord injury (SCI) with various neurological deficits after minor trauma. Few studies have investigated the influence of OPLL on neurological outcome after acute cord injury. We examined whether severe spinal canal stenosis caused by OPLL affects neurological outcome after SCI based on intramedullary signal intensity (SI) changes on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.