Abstract

BackgroundEndometrial cancer is the second most common cancer among female cancer survivors in the US and is increasing in incidence. Rural endometrial cancer patients experience lower survival rates but the reasons for the lower survival are not known. The aim of this study is to examine whether prognostic factors are different for rural and urban patients in a population-based cohort.MethodsEndometrial cancer patients diagnosed 1997-2012 were identified through the Utah Cancer Registry and Utah Population Database. The address at cancer diagnosis was used to classify patients in rural or urban residences. Demographic and cancer-specific characteristics were examined as prognostic factors for both all-cause and endometrial cancer-specific mortality using Cox proportional hazards models.ResultsThere were 2,994 endometrial cancer patients and 14.1% of these patients lived in rural areas at diagnosis. Rural endometrial cancer patients were older at cancer diagnosis and did not appear to be different in terms of obesity or overweight at cancer diagnosis. There were no differences for treatment or stage at diagnosis although rural patients had higher proportions of higher grade. Age at diagnosis, poverty, education, and histology were significant prognostic factors for all-cause death. Rural patients with more advanced stages of cancer had significantly increased risks of all-cause and endometrial cancer-specific death than urban patients. Rural endometrial cancer patients diagnosed at advanced stage had a 17-fold increase in the risk of all-cause death compared to an 8-fold increase in death for urban patients.ConclusionsRural endometrial cancer patients in Utah were older at diagnosis, had higher grade and higher comorbidities. While urban and rural endometrial cancer patients shared many prognostic factors, the risk of mortality is greater among rural patients with advanced stage endometrial cancer. Future studies should examine where patients are receiving treatment and how that impacts their survival and how to reduce the mortality rates of high risk patients.

Highlights

  • Endometrial cancer is the second most common cancer among female cancer survivors in the US, with an estimated 757,190 survivors in 2017 [1]

  • The aim of this study is to examine whether prognostic factors are different for rural and urban patients, as well as to examine the trends of treatment and mortality over time in rural and urban areas

  • We examined prognostic factors in a statewide population-based cohort of first primary endometrial cancer patients who were linked to medical record data, cancer registry data, death records, and demographic data from the Utah Department of Health

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Endometrial cancer is the second most common cancer among female cancer survivors in the US, with an estimated 757,190 survivors in 2017 [1]. While Modesitt et al reported significantly increased disease-specific survival for patients in rural areas, there was no significant difference in overall survival among 3,562 endometrial cancer patients [9]. Rural patients received a less comprehensive surgical evaluation and are less likely to have multimodality treatment and have any lymph nodes removed [9, 11] These treatment differences have been previously associated with lower survival rural endometrial cancer patients [11]. The aim of this study is to examine whether prognostic factors are different for rural and urban patients, as well as to examine the trends of treatment and mortality over time in rural and urban areas. The aim of this study is to examine whether prognostic factors are different for rural and urban patients in a population-based cohort

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call