Prognostic factors and role of postoperative radiotherapy in surgically resected thymomas

Abstract

ObjectiveTo investigate the prognostic factors in and role of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) for surgically resected thymomas. MethodsA total of 1540 patients with pathologically confirmed thymomas undergoing resection between 2000 and 2018 were identified retrospectively from the SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results) database. Tumors were restaged as local (limited to thymus), regional (invasion to mediastinal fat and other neighboring structures), or distant stage. Disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated by the Kaplan–Meier method and the log-rank test. Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs were calculated by Cox proportional hazards modeling. ResultsTumor stage and histology were independent predictors of both DSS (regional: HR, 3.711; 95% CI, 2.006-6.864; distant: HR, 7.920; 95% CI, 4.061-15.446; type B2/B3: HR, 1.435; 95% CI, 1.008-2.044) and OS (regional: HR, 1.461; 95% CI, 1.139-1.875; distant: HR, 2.551; 95% CI, 1.855-3.509; type B2/B3: HR, 1.409; 95% CI, 1.153-1.723). For patients with regional stage and type B2/B3 thymomas, PORT was associated with better DSS after thymectomy/thymomectomy (HR, 0.268; 95% CI, 0.099-0.727), but the association was not significant after extended thymectomy (HR, 1.514; 95% CI, 0.516-4.44). Among patients with lymph node metastases, those who received PORT (HR, 0.372; 95% CI, 0.146-0.949), chemotherapy (HR, 0.843; 95% CI, 0.303-2.346), or both (HR, 0.296, 95% CI, 0.071-1.236) had a better OS. ConclusionsThe extent of invasion and tumor histology were independent predictors of worse survival following surgical resection of thymoma. Patients with regional invasion and type B2/B3 thymoma who undergo thymectomy/thymomectomy may benefit from PORT, while patients with nodal metastases may benefit from multimodal therapy, including PORT and chemotherapy.