Abstract

In order to study the prognostic value of quantifying the chromatin structure of cell nuclei from patients with early ovarian cancer, low dimensionality adaptive fractal and Gray Level Cooccurrence Matrix texture feature vectors were extracted from nuclei images of monolayers and histological sections. Each light microscopy nucleus image was divided into a peripheral and a central part, representing 30% and 70% of the total area of the nucleus, respectively. Textural features were then extracted from the peripheral and central parts of the nuclei images. The adaptive feature extraction was based on Class Difference Matrices and Class Distance Matrices. These matrices were useful to illustrate the difference in chromatin texture between the good and bad prognosis classes of ovarian samples. Class Difference and Distance Matrices also clearly illustrated the difference in texture between the peripheral and central parts of cell nuclei. Both when working with nuclei images from monolayers and from histological sections it seems useful to extract separate features from the peripheral and central parts of the nuclei images.

Highlights

  • Most women undergoing treatment for early ovarian cancer have a good prognosis, but about 20% will eventually die of the disease

  • We have extracted low dimensionality adaptive texture feature vectors for two different texture analysis methods in order to quantify the chromatin structure of cell nuclei from patients with early ovarian cancer

  • The ordinary Gray Level Cooccurrence Matrix (GLCM) method [6] is a good example of a texture method with a large number of pre-defined features combined with a number of free parameters

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Most women undergoing treatment for early ovarian cancer have a good prognosis, but about 20% will eventually die of the disease. Whatever sophisticated feature selection algorithms we use, the risk of purely coincidental “good” feature sets may become alarmingly high, if the available data set is limited. This is a problem if separate training and test sets are not used [16]. We have proposed a small number of adaptive texture features that can be extracted by applying the same approach to several texture methods [2,3,13,14] These adaptive texture features are based on Class Difference Matrices and Mahalanobis Class Distance Matrices

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call