Prognosis of late versus early ventricular fibrillation in acute myocardial infarction

Abstract

To determine the prognosis of late ventricular fibrillation (VF) after acute myocardial infarction (AMI), the length of the monitoring period after AMI was extended. All patients in this series were continuously monitored in a coronary care unit to ensure observation of all VF within 18 days of AMI. From 1977 to 1985, 4,269 patients were admitted with AMI and 413 (9.6%) had in-hospital VF. Of these 281 (6.8%) had early VF (<48 hours after AMI) and 132 (3.2%) had late VF (≥48 hours after AMI). In-hospital mortality was 50 and 54% for early and late VF, respectively (p = 0.31). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed better survival after discharge for patients with early versus late VF (p = 0.009) but this difference was fully explained by the presence of heart failure. Survival analysis showed the same prognosis after 1, 3 and 5 years for early and late VF, when VF was not associated with heart failure. When VF was associated with heart failure (secondary VF) early VF had a greater mortality than late VF after 2 and 5 years. Logistic regression analysis showed that heart failure (relative risk 1.9 [1.1 to 3.1]) and cardiogenic shock (relative risk 3.9 [1.8 to 8.5]) were significant risk factors for in-hospital death. Late VF compared to early VF had no prognostic implication (relative risk 1.0 [0.6 to 1.6]). For patients discharged from the hospital, risk factors were heart failure (1.8 [1.1 to 2.8]) and previous AMI (1.6 [1.3 to 2.1]). Late VF showed a trend (1.2 [0.8 to 1.8]) toward poorer long-term prognosis than early VF. There is no special risk for patients with late VF compared to patients with early VF after AMI when they are monitored as described.