Prognosis and safety of radium-223 with concurrent abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide use for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: Real-world data of Japanese patients.

Abstract

ObjectivesTo evaluate the real‐world data on the efficacy and safety of a combination therapy with radium‐223 (Ra‐223) and second‐generation androgen‐receptor targeting agents (ARTAs), including abiraterone acetate (ABI) and enzalutamide (ENZ), among Japanese patients with bone metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer (CRPC).Patients and methodsWe retrospectively reviewed 79 patients with bone metastatic CRPC who were treated with Ra‐223. The number of patients with concurrent ARTA use was 24:17 receiving ABI and 7 receiving ENZ. We evaluated the overall survival (OS) according to ARTA use and compared the survival of patients treated with Ra‐223 with or without ARTA using multivariate analysis.ResultsThe median survival in the entire cohort was 23.5 months. The patients receiving Ra‐223 combined with ARTA showed a tendency of better OS than patients treated with Ra‐223 alone, although no significant difference was observed (median OS, 26.5 vs 23.5 months; P = .115). A multivariate analysis showed that the extent of disease on bone scan (EOD) scores and pain at baseline were significant predictors of OS. The concurrent use of bone‐modifying agents (BMAs) was not significant for favorable OS (P = .050). However, the concurrent use of second‐generation ARTA was not a significant factor for OS. Regarding safety, a bone fracture occurred in only one (4.2%) of 24 patients treated with combined Ra‐223 and ARTA therapy.ConclusionOur real‐world data analysis suggested that Ra‐223 combined with a second‐generation ARTA is well tolerated in Japanese patients. The EOD score and pain at baseline are significant prognostic factors for OS, but the concurrent use of second‐generation ARTA has no influence on OS among men treated with Ra‐223. The concurrent use of BMA yields a marginally favorable OS.