Abstract
BackgroundDespite longer lifespans, guidelines for prostate cancer treatment recommend surgery for those with over 10 years of life expectancy, potentially leaving older patients undertreated. This study examines the outcomes of radical prostatectomy (RP) in a large cohort of men older than 75 years. Materials and methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 636 patients from a pool of 4,500 RP cases at a single tertiary institution from 2004 to 2022. Patients younger than 75 years or with incomplete records were excluded. Baseline clinical variables, including PSA and biopsy grade group (GG), as well as postoperative pathology and oncological outcomes, were assessed. Achievement of continence based on no pads and ≤1 pad at last follow-up were evaluated. ResultsMean age and PSA were 76.4 years and 15.3 ng/ml, respectively. At biopsy, GG1 and 2 were found in 18.1% and 31.5%, respectively, with 28.5% harboring GG4-5 tumors. After RP, 41.5% had GG upgrade compared to biopsy results, with 46.5% with ≥pT3 tumors. In a mean follow-up of 41.5 months, 82.3% were able to attain total continence of 0 pads, and 89.5% used ≤1 pads at the last follow-up. Overall and cancer-specific mortality was observed in 4.3% and 0.9%, respectively, and biochemical recurrence (BCR) occurred in 20.3% after a median of 154 months. At multivariate analysis, age was not a significant factor for BCR, whereas preoperative PSA, biopsy GG, margin positivity, and lymph node invasion were significant. ConclusionRP is feasible in men older than 75 years with decent oncological outcome, with absolute age insignificant within this age group. Risk of undertreatment should be acknowledged, and definite treatment must be considered.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.