Abstract

BackgroundOral progestin has recently been used to prevent premature LH surges in ovarian stimulation, and this progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) is effective and safe in patients with different ovarian reserves. The current data are lacking regarding how to individualize the gonadotropin dose and regimen for women with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS). A retrospective cohort trial was performed to evaluate the efficacy of progestin-primed milder stimulation with clomiphene citrate (CC) compared to the standard progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocol for infertile women with PCOS.MethodsA total of 220 PCOS women were collected and classified into the study group (HMG 150 IU/d + CC 50 mg/d + MPA 10 mg/d) and control group (HMG 225 IU/d + MPA 10 mg/d). Ovulation was triggered by GnRH agonist 0.1 mg and hCG 1000 IU when dominant follicles matured. Viable embryos were cryopreserved for later transfer. The primary endpoint was the ongoing pregnancy rate. Secondary outcomes included the cycle characteristics and the live birth rate.Result(s)The study group consumed less HMG (1470.0 ± 360.1 IU vs 1943.8 ± 372.0 IU, P < 0.001) and harvested fewer oocytes than the control group (12.2 ± 7.4 vs 18.2 ± 9.7, P < 0.001). The study group showed a higher mid-follicular LH concentration (4.49 ± 2.49 mIU/ml vs 2.52 ± 2.09 mIU/ml, P < 0.05) but no endogenous LH surge. No between-group difference was found in the incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) (0.91% vs 0.91%, P > 0.05). The cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate and live birth rate per patient were lower but did not reach significance compared with the control group (71.8% vs 81.8 and 64.5% vs 75.5%, respectively, both P > 0.05).Conclusion(s)The milder PPOS with CC in PCOS women led to lower oocyte yields and suboptimal pregnancy outcomes compared to the standard PPOS treatment. The two regimens both achieved a low incidence of OHSS. The results from the CC combination regimen provide a new insight for developing a more patient-friendly protocol for PCOS women.

Highlights

  • Oral progestin has recently been used to prevent premature Luteinizing hormone (LH) surges in ovarian stimulation, and this progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) is effective and safe in patients with different ovarian reserves

  • Thanks to the progress of vitrification, oral progestin has been successfully used to prevent premature LH surges in women undergoing ovarian stimulation [6,7,8]

  • Milder stimulation, with its advantages of patient-friendliness, is a good solution for producing an acceptable pregnancy outcome and eliminating ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) for high responders. This retrospective cohort trial demonstrated that the milder PPOS with clomiphene citrate (CC) led to lower oocyte yields and suboptimal pregnancy outcomes compared to the standard PPOS protocol in polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) women, and the incidence of OHSS was low in both groups (0.91%)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Oral progestin has recently been used to prevent premature LH surges in ovarian stimulation, and this progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) is effective and safe in patients with different ovarian reserves. PCOS women undergoing IVF treatment typically produce an increased number of oocytes, which are often of poor quality, leading to a lower fertilization rate and a higher miscarriage rate [3]. They face a higher risk of moderate/severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) [4, 5]. Thanks to the progress of vitrification, oral progestin has been successfully used to prevent premature LH surges in women undergoing ovarian stimulation [6,7,8] This progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) yields a comparable pregnancy outcome, it consumes a slightly higher gonadotropin dosage than conventional short protocols [6]. The existing data from clinical trials often use the equal initiating doses of gonadotropin for women with or without PCOS, but relevant data are lacking about how to individualize the gonadotropin dose and regimen for PCOS women undergoing ovarian stimulation

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.