Abstract
In May 2001, the US Government's National Energy Policy Development Group proposed to increase investment in domestic oil resources and to diversify further the sourcing of US oil imports by increasing production in new petroleum provinces. The paper argues that both strands of this policy are dependent upon a third, unstated, objective--to ensure that OPEC retains sufficient market power to prevent the sort of collapse in world oil prices that occurred in 1998--99. The consequences of that collapse, when the real price of US oil fell to its lowest level in 53 years, are explored. Finally, it is argued that the outcome of the crisis was a rapprochement between OPEC and the US. It is suggested that the consensus between the US and OPEC as to the desired range within which the world oil price should move is likely to survive any temporary political disturbances. Copyright 2003, Oxford University Press.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.