Abstract
Discriminating the significant human-induced vegetation changes over the past 15 years could help local governments review the effects of eco-programs and develop sustainable land use policies in arid/semi-arid ecosystems. We used the residual trends method (RESTREND) to estimate the human-induced and climate-induced vegetation changes. Two typical regions in the Horqin Sandy Land of China were selected as study areas. We first detected vegetation dynamics between 2000–2014 using Sen’s slope estimation and the Mann–Kendall test detection method (SMK) based on the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) time series, then used RESTREND to profile human modifications in areas of significant vegetation change. RESTREND was optimized using statistical and trajectory analysis to automatically identify flexible spatially homogeneous neighborhoods, which were essential for determining the reference areas. The results indicated the following. (1) Obvious vegetation increases happened in both regions, but Naiman (64.1%) increased more than Ar Horqin (16.8%). (2) Climate and human drivers both contributed to significant changes. The two factors contributed equally to vegetation change in Ar Horqin, while human drivers contributed more in Naiman. (3) Human factors had a stronger influence on ecosystems, and were more responsible for vegetation decreases in both regions. Further evidences showed that the primary human drivers varied in regions. Grassland eco-management was the key driver in Ar Horqin, while farming was the key factor for vegetation change in Naiman.
Highlights
Discriminating between the driving forces of vegetation change is necessary in order to understand the interacting mechanisms between ecosystems and external drivers, and help environmental managers make effective decisions that maintain the sustainable development of ecosystems [1,2]
In the Ar Horqin region, about 18.6% of the total area (2371.1 km2) had a significant trend of change (p < 0.05), with 16.8% of the area increasing by more than 10%, and only 1.3% of the area decreasing more than −10%
The results showed that vegetation in most of the human-induced change area increased by more than 40%, while climate change resulted in less rapid changes, with most of the climate-induced change area increasing between 20–40%
Summary
Discriminating between the driving forces of vegetation change is necessary in order to understand the interacting mechanisms between ecosystems and external drivers, and help environmental managers make effective decisions that maintain the sustainable development of ecosystems [1,2]. Complex external driving forces influence the processes of vegetation change, of which climate change and human activities are two main factors within decadal time scales [3,4,5]. Climate variations, such as increases or decrease in precipitation and temperature would result in a corresponding trend of greening and browning in vegetation cover [3,5,6]. On a scale of decades, human activities may have more deep and dramatic influences on vegetation growth than climate variations [11]. Discriminating human-induced vegetation change has always been a challenging issue [1,13,14], even considering the long-term perspective of palaeoecology [15,16]
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
