Abstract

Recently, the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) Research Network and Asian Cancer Research Group provided a new classification of gastric cancer (GC) to aid the development of biomarkers for targeted therapy and predict prognosis. We studied associations between genetically aberrant profiles of cancer-related genes, environmental factors, and histopathological features in 107 paired gastric tumor-non-tumor tissue GC samples. 6.5% of our GC cases were classified as the EBV subtype, 17.8% as the MSI subtype, 43.0% as the CIN subtype, and 32.7% as the GS subtype. The distribution of four GC subgroups based on the TCGA and our dataset were similar. The MSI subtype showed a hyper-mutated status and the best prognosis among molecular subtype. However, molecular classification based on the four GC subtypes showed no significant survival differences in terms of overall survival (p= 0.548) or relapse-free survival (RFS, p=0.518). The P619fs*43 in ZBTB20 was limited to MSI group (n= 5/19, 26.3%), showing similar trends observed in TCGA dataset.Genetic alterations of the RTK/RAS/MAPK and PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathways were detected in 34.6% of GC cases (37 individual cases). We also found two cases with likely pathogenic variants (NM_004360.4: c. 2494 G>A, p.V832M) in the CDH1 gene.Here, we classified molecular subtypes of GC according to the TCGA system and provide a critical starting point for the design of more appropriate clinical trials based on a comprehensive analysis of genetic alterations in Korean GC patients.

Highlights

  • Gastric cancer (GC) is ranked fifth for cancer incidence and second for cancer deaths, and one in 36 men and 1 in 84 women develop stomach cancer before age 79 [1]

  • We studied associations between genetically aberrant profiles of cancer-related genes, environmental factors, and histopathological features in 107 paired gastric tumornon-tumor tissue gastric cancer (GC) samples. 6.5% of our GC cases were classified as the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) subtype, 17.8% as the microsatellite instability (MSI) subtype, 43.0% as the chromosomal instability (CIN) subtype, and 32.7% as the genomically stable (GS) subtype

  • For GC classified according to the 2010 WHO classification, the tubular type (64.5%) was observed with the highest frequency, while the poorly cohesive type and mixed type accounted for 13.1% and 15.0%, respectively

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Gastric cancer (GC) is ranked fifth for cancer incidence and second for cancer deaths, and one in 36 men and 1 in 84 women develop stomach cancer before age 79 [1]. The histologic classification of gastric carcinoma has been based on the Lauren [2] and 2010 WHO classification systems, which recognize four histological subtypes [3]. Neither the Lauren nor the WHO system is clinically useful, as their prognostic and predictive capabilities cannot adequately guide patient management. New classifications are needed for GC to provide insights into pathogenesis and the identification of new biomarkers and novel treatment targets [4]. To provide a roadmap for patient stratification and trials of targeted therapies, the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call