Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the profile and scientific production of researchers in oral pathology who received grants in the area of Dentistry from the Brazilian National Research and Development Council. MATERIAL AND METHOD : The standardized online curriculum vitae (Curriculum Lattes) of 34 researchers in oral pathology who received grants in the years 2008-2010 were analyzed. The variables were: gender, affiliation, time from completion of the PhD program, scientific production, and supervision of undergraduate students and Master's and PhD programs. RESULT: The States of São Paulo (52.94%) and Minas Gerais (26.47%) were responsible for 79.41% of the researchers. Regarding affiliation, three institutions accounted for approximately 44.11% of the researchers: UNICAMP (17.64%); USP (14.70%); and UFMG (11.76%). The researchers published a total of 906 full-text articles, with a median of 26.64 articles per researcher in the triennium and 8.88 articles per year. It was found that of 906 articles published, 366 (40.39%) were published in strata A (qualis-CAPES). Oral pathology researchers supervised 437 scientific initiation and post-graduate students. Of these, 138 (31.57%) were scientific initiation, 169 (38.67%) were Master and 130 (29.74%) were PhD students. CONCLUSION: An important scientific production of oral pathology researchers in the 2008-2010 triennium was observed. By knowing the profile of researchers in oral pathology, more effective strategies for encouraging scientific production and demanding resources to finance research projects can be defined.
Highlights
Scientific production in Brazil has consistently grown based on an increase in total funding for science and technology that soared from 21.4 billion reais (US$ 11.4 billion) to 43.1 billion reais[1]
The National Council for the Development of Science and Technology (CNPq) funds research based on a peer evaluation of the merits of the proponents and of their proposals, and it provides a particular form of funding for researches, called scientific productivity fellowships
These researchers are currently classified into two main categories for this fellowship: researcher category 1 and researcher category 2, by decreasing order of value and prestige
Summary
Scientific production in Brazil has consistently grown based on an increase in total funding for science and technology that soared from 21.4 billion reais (US$ 11.4 billion) to 43.1 billion reais (or from 1.26% to 1.43% of Brazil’s growing gross domestic product; GDP)[1]. The National Council for the Development of Science and Technology (CNPq) funds research based on a peer evaluation of the merits of the proponents and of their proposals, and it provides a particular form of funding for researches, called scientific productivity fellowships. These researchers are currently classified into two main categories for this fellowship: researcher category 1 and researcher category 2, by decreasing order of value and prestige. Category 1 is subdivided into four levels: 1A, 1B, 1C and 1D, where the first level is only attributed to researchers with notorious scientific productivity[3]
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
