Abstract
BackgroundAnti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPAs) are important for the detection of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). There are many laboratories to detect it in their routine work, but their performance is not displayed in China. To examine the performance of ACPA assays from all laboratories, it is necessary to organize a laboratory proficiency test (PT). MethodsA panel of 5 samples, including 4 positive and 1 negative, was produced by the National Center for Clinical Laboratories, using serum derived from patients, then distributed to 271 clinical laboratories. Quantitative and qualitative results reported by the participating laboratories were compared. ResultsOverall, 80.97% (200/247) of the laboratories had eligible PT scores. Of the kits used, most ELISA and chemiluminescence kits had a high sensitivity and specificity. Regarding intra-assay discrepancy, the Roche and Abbott kit had a better variable coefficient. The ratios of the quantitative results to the kit-specific cut-off values were similar. ConclusionPerformance varied between laboratories. Reagents and methods are the most important factors. Other factors may affect the intra-assay discrepancy. The similar mean of ratios of the quantitative results to the kit-assigned cut-offs suggests that a national criterion is requisite. It is necessary to organize a PT to identify performances of different laboratories.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.