Abstract
Twenty-one Italian laboratories participated for four consecutive years in the collaborative Italian proficiency testing of HLA class II (DRB1, DRB3, DRB4 and DRB5) high-resolution typing. In this paper the results are analysed. Seven different kinds of errors are described and discussed. The errors were divided into technical errors and errors of allele reporting. Each year, a list of errors made was prepared by our laboratory and discussed collegially with all laboratories. The allele reporting errors diminished over time, as a result of the common discussions. The technical performance of the laboratories did not improve overall for the 21 laboratories participating: for 16 of them results were good or improved in quality, but for the remaining five results deteriorated over time. From this experience, some recommendations for the future emerged. A relevant conclusion was that, to improve the performance of a group of laboratories, the proficiency test is not effective alone, but should be integrated within a framework of continuous collaboration and mutual technical help.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: European journal of immunogenetics : official journal of the British Society for Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.