Abstract

<strong>Background:</strong> Prior work has investigated engineering students’ professional formation through the lens of individual experience and from a cultural perspective. The concept of professional shame provides an opportunity to explore students’ experiences of disciplinary expectations as situated in a context of engineering social norms. <strong>Purpose:</strong> In this study, we investigated (i) how students experienced subjectively not meeting their internalized expectations of what it means to be and succeed as an engineering student and (ii) their reactions and responses to such experiences and how those experiences manifested in the social context. <strong>Methodology:</strong> We conducted 10 focus groups involving 38 total participants. We then coded and qualitatively analyzed focus group transcripts using an ethnographic focus on how students encounter and respond to shame within the cultural context. Our data gathering and analysis was theoretically framed by a model of professional shame as a mediating factor in how students interpreted and eventually co-constructed shared engineering expectations and master narratives during their professional socialization. <strong>Findings: </strong> We identified six main patterns of responses to shame that students enacted and that, in turn, interacted to form social norms around expectations. These responses, which emerged as nuanced and context dependent, are: (i) hiding (ii) masking (iii) trivializing shame experiences (iv) emulating perceived success markers (v) suffering passively (vi) legitimizing shame experiences. Our findings also demonstrate a complex interplay between the students’ individual and professional sense of self that significantly impacts professional socialization in engineering. <strong>Conclusions:</strong> Shame has emerged as a key mechanism in engineering professional socialization as students’ shame responses influence both their individual identity and the ways they collectively co-produce cultural norms. An awareness of these often-invisible dynamics can enable educators to empathically engage students in ways that allow for vulnerability and struggle while promoting healthy positive development.

Highlights

  • Studies in EngineeringNotions of rigor in engineering education have been critically examined for their problematicEducation connotations for engineering learning cultures and negative impacts on students’ experience, retention, and diversity (Riley, 2017; Sochacka, Walther, Rich, & Brewer, 2021)

  • Shame has emerged as a key mechanism in engineering professional socialization as students’ shame responses influence both their individual identity and the ways they collectively co-produce cultural norms

  • Our previous work has examined the individual experience of professional shame, with implications to advancing personal well-being (Huff et al, 2021), identified specific expectations that reside in engineering education cultures (Kamanda et al, 2021), and the processes by which students construct and enact these expectations (Secules et al, 2021)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Studies in EngineeringNotions of rigor in engineering education have been critically examined for their problematicEducation connotations for engineering learning cultures and negative impacts on students’ experience, retention, and diversity (Riley, 2017; Sochacka, Walther, Rich, & Brewer, 2021). Our previous work has examined the individual experience of professional shame, with implications to advancing personal well-being (Huff et al, 2021), identified specific expectations that reside in engineering education cultures (Kamanda et al, 2021), and the processes by which students construct and enact these expectations (Secules et al, 2021). We focus our findings on how students construct responses to professional shame, which simultaneously enable them to cope with the painful emotional state while they reinforce sociocultural narratives that induced their experiences of professional shame By identifying these responses to professional shame, we aim to provide educators with tools to recognize how education cultures within engineering disciplines might be adversely undermining desired outcomes of social equity and well-being. Purpose: In this study, we investigated (i) how students experienced subjectively not meeting their internalized expectations of what it means to be and succeed as an engineering student and (ii) their reactions and responses to such experiences and how those experiences manifested in the social context

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call