Abstract
Background:Frail older people living in the community require multidisciplinary care. Despite the fact that patient participation is high on the public agenda, studies into multidisciplinary care mainly focus on the viewpoints of professionals. Little is known about frail older patients’ experiences with care delivered by multidisciplinary teams and their perception of collaboration between professional and informal caregivers.Objective:To gain more insight into the experiences of frail older patients with integrated multidisciplinary care by mapping the care networks of this patient group and their perception of the interconnection between professional and informal caregivers.Methods:Survey study to facilitate a care network analysis. Due to the vulnerable health status of the respondents, questionnaires were completed during interviews. Analysis was performed using an iterative process, using both visual and metric techniques.Participants:44 older persons, considered ‘frail’ by their general practitioner.Setting:Four general practices in The Netherlands.Results:The networks of the participants consisted of an average of 15 actors connected by 54 ties. General practitioners were the most common actors in the networks, and were well connected to medical specialists and in-home care providers. The participants did not always perceive a connection between their general practitioner and their informal caregiver. The network analyses resulted in the identification of three subtypes: simple star (n = 16), complex star (n = 16), and sub-group networks (n = 12).Conclusions:Our findings indicate that the elderly often do not experience the integration of multidisciplinary care as such. This is a real opportunity for MTs to improve their care and to make the patients’ experiences better in line with what they are aiming: allowing patients to live at home as healthy and independently as possible for as long as possible. We showed that informal caregivers often form communication bridges between patients and professionals. Having a better knowledge of the patient perspective enables the gaps in professional care networks of frail older people to be filled and facilitates the anticipation of crisis situations.
Highlights
Context A growing number of frail older people is living in the community [1, 2]
Despite the fact that patient participation is high on the public agenda, studies show that multidisciplinary teams often operate from a professional perspective, and studies into interprofessional collaboration mainly focus on the viewpoints of professionals [11,12,13] or on more quantitative patient outcomes [14,15,16,17]
We addressed the following network variables: personal characteristics, health status, persons involved in their care network, and care co-ordination (‘Is there a care provider who ensures that your care is organised well?’)
Summary
Context A growing number of frail older people is living in the community [1, 2]. Frailty is defined as the accumulation of deficits and diminishing reserves [3]. As previous studies have stressed, increasing communication with informal caregivers is very important in order to actively involve them in the care of older patients with multimorbidities and complex care needs [18,19,20]. Despite the fact that patient participation is high on the public agenda, studies into multidisciplinary care mainly focus on the viewpoints of professionals. Little is known about frail older patients’ experiences with care delivered by multidisciplinary teams and their perception of collaboration between professional and informal caregivers. Objective: To gain more insight into the experiences of frail older patients with integrated multidisciplinary care by mapping the care networks of this patient group and their perception of the interconnection between professional and informal caregivers. Having a better knowledge of the patient perspective enables the gaps in professional care networks of frail older people to be filled and facilitates the anticipation of crisis situations
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
