Abstract

Productivity is growing in importance in Kurdistan as it evolves into a more formal, market-based economy. The measurement of productivity and factors of production - labor and capital – are important indicators of industrial firm performance, with an increase in productivity positively affecting economic growth. This research attempts to quantify the impacts of labor & capital on industrial productivity in the Kurdistan region, Iraq. Moreover, the correspondence between a number of hypotheses and empirical findings are examined. Specifically, this research creates a protocol to enable comparison among productivity indicators in production units in industrial firms. We examine the role of capital and labor forces on productivity in industries of Kurdistan over the 1995-2008 period. The study uses the added values of output, the number of workers, and capital value on productivity. Total Factor Productivity (TFP) is another indicator that is estimated in this research. The results indicate that the growth of industrial firms in Kurdistan is influenced more by labor than by capital productivity. The measurement of these effects is 0.65 and 1.42 for labor and capital, respectively. The production function exhibits increasing returns to scale. It can be concluded that labor is more significant to productivity than capital in this region. It reinforces the low level of technology in firms. Capital per worker (k=K/L) has a positive and significant effect on productivity in industrial firms of Kurdistan region.

Highlights

  • Productivity – and its measurement thereof - is growing in importance in Kurdistan

  • Due to the importance of capital and labor in industrial firms, this paper examines the effects of capital and labor on industrial productivity in Kurdistan Region

  • In 1974, data show that there were 4,125 big industrial firms in different fields in Iraq, but only 6 big firms were in the Kurdistan region (Industry ministry, 2008)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Productivity – and its measurement thereof - is growing in importance in Kurdistan. This is true with respect to labor and capital inputs. Schultz (1961) and Becker (1964) were among the first to measure the relationship between input productivity and economic growth. The main objective of this analysis is to explain the fluctuations and trend in capital and labor productivity in industrial firms. Adam Smith (1723-1790) stated "productivity is the relationship between labor force and production." Initially research on productivity examined the role of capital and technology in industrial development (Grliches, et al, 1998). Setohuraman (1974) studied productivity in the Indian economy and the results of his research show that the commerce sector has significant productivity. Industrial productivity in Iraq is 74% lower than South Korea (United Nations Development Program, UNDP, 1998)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.