Abstract

Accession to the euro area is a long term process that is still under way for most transition economies, and different paths to macroeconomic stabilization were adopted by local authorities. This study is based on data for three groups of countries: EEC Eastern European countries (Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Ukraine), BC Baltic countries (Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania), CEC Core European countries (France, Germany, Italy). We acknowledge that, well beyond plain economic convergence, the integration process is affected by peculiar political pressures; nonetheless our aim is to determine whether a group of countries is better suited to enter the euro area (more EMU-ready), or if transition economies does not share a common growth pattern with core European countries. Although labour productivity points to a substantial convergence of transition economies, kernel estimation methods shows a twin peak (bimodal) distribution, providing evidence against the convergence hypothesis. We use non-parametric, linear programming technique DEA to compare efficiency of decision-making units (DMUs). Since evidence is quite puzzling, decomposition of Malmquist productivity index is needed. Lastly, a tentative explanation of productivity growth through governance indicators is proposed.

Highlights

  • After the collapse of the iron curtain, the transition process from centrally planned economies towards free markets led Eastern European countries to a progressive improvement of living standards

  • Our sample is not wide enough, we tentatively look for econometric evidence of correlation between multifactor productivity (MFP) growth and a number of indicators published by the World Bank

  • A massive bulk of research has been devoted to investigation of the process of economic growth across European Union regions, and in particular in assessing the presence of convergence in regional growth rates

Read more

Summary

Introduction

After the collapse of the iron curtain, the transition process from centrally planned economies towards free markets led Eastern European countries to a progressive improvement of living standards. Baltic states (Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania) enjoyed an impressive growth in GDP per capita, averaging 5 percent or more a year, while the pace of economic improvement has been a little slower in Czech Republic, Poland, Slovak Republic, Slovenia and in South eastern European countries such as Bulgaria and Croatia. Since transition is a composite and complex process of transformation which includes liberalization, macroeconomic stabilization, privatization, and legal and institutional reforms, the path to a market economy is affected by the initial standings and the internal factors in each country, and heavily relies on the trade integration process, which proceeded rapidly among EU members since the completion of the internal market in the late 1980s and has accelerated since the accession of the “new EU-12” countries (Slovakia, Slovenia, Czech Republic, Estonia, Lithuania, Latvia, Poland, Cyprus, Malta, Hungary, Romania and Bulgaria). The impact of EU’s common external tariff and product and labour market regulations have added to the regulatory burden of enterprises and made convergence harder for poorest nations

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call