Abstract

Current studies on nanocomposites have focused on their multifunctional properties and their industrial production. In this work, polyetheretherketone (PEEK)/graphene nanoplate (GNP) composites were produced by a direct semi-industrial process. Different percentages of untreated GNP (1, 5, and 10 wt.%) were added to PEEK by employing melt-compounding followed by injection-moulding. Despite the semi-industrial approach used, the modulus, strength, and Poisson coefficient of the nanocomposites (1 and 5 wt.%) were not significantly affected by the addition of GNP. However, there was a slight decrease in the strength at 10 wt.% GNP. Our study also shows that the thermal conductivities of PEEK/GNP composites are up to 2.5 times higher than that of pure PEEK.

Highlights

  • Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) is a high-performance, semi-crystalline thermoplastic polymer that is used in the aeronautics, medical, and chemical industries as it has excellent mechanical properties including good thermal stability and chemical inertness [1, 2, 3]

  • Solution intercalation gave the best results in terms of thermal conductivity (0.35 W/mK for 1 wt.% graphene oxide mixed by solution intercalation [5] versus 0.44 W/mK for 10 wt.% of graphene nanoplates (GNPs) mixed by melt-intercalation [22])

  • The morphology of the as-received graphene nanoplatelets was characterised by using scanning electron microscopy (SEM)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) is a high-performance, semi-crystalline thermoplastic polymer that is used in the aeronautics, medical, and chemical industries as it has excellent mechanical properties including good thermal stability and chemical inertness [1, 2, 3]. Solution intercalation is based on a solvent system where the polymer is soluble; this helps the reinforcement dispersion, whereas in melt-intercalation, the molten polymer penetrates the graphene layers of the agglomerates, avoiding re-agglomeration [24]. Of these two methods, solution intercalation gave the best results in terms of thermal conductivity (0.35 W/mK for 1 wt.% graphene oxide mixed by solution intercalation [5] versus 0.44 W/mK for 10 wt.% of GNP mixed by melt-intercalation [22]). The fracture surfaces and the dispersion of graphene within the matrix of samples were analysed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM)

Materials
Nanocomposite preparation by extrusion moulding
Density measurement and morphological analysis of the samples
Differential Scanning Calorimetry
Mechanical characterisation
Specimen preparation by injection moulding
Characterisation of GNPs and composite injection samples
Differential scanning calorimetry
Mechanical properties
Thermal conductivity
Conclusions
Alvaredo-Atienza
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call