Abstract
When talkers are aware of listeners’ speech perception difficulties due to hearing loss, noise, or a language barrier, they typically adopt an intelligibility-enhancing speaking style known as “clear speech.” To the extent that clear speech is more intelligible than “conversational speech,” a cross-style acoustic-phonetic comparison provides information about factors that affect speech intelligibility. I will present data from a project that tested the hypothesis that clear speech is guided by both universal, auditory-perceptual factors and language-specific, structural factors. The former serve to enhance the overall acoustic salience of the speech signal such that it is more resistant to the adverse effects of noise or listener-related perceptual deficits; the latter serves to enhance the realization of phonological contrasts. This hypothesis predicts that clear speech production shows predictable and systematic cross-language similarities and differences, and that the clear speech intelligibility benefit is modulated by the listeners’ experience with the target language. To address these predictions, we present data from a cross-language comparison of clear speech production and a cross-population comparison of clear speech perception. These studies provide fundamental information about variability in speech intelligibility which may ultimately lead to effective, efficient, and listener-specific speech intelligibility enhancement strategies.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.