Abstract
This article contributes to recent debates regarding graphic design and research – in this journal and elsewhere – by reflecting on my own project, which may or may not be considered research. London is Changing was staged online and on large-scale networked digital billboards in Central London during 2015. It engaged the participation of more than 5,000 Londoners in a discussion about the future of the city. Reflecting on the significance and outcomes of London is Changing, and in particular why it is so difficult to frame as research, provides the basis for a broader reconsideration of the definition and valuation of graphic design research. One key issue is whether or not it is productive for those involved in graphic design, a discipline that is arguably defined by its experimental approach to publishing, to focus on conventional or externally prescribed forms of scholarly publishing in an attempt to strengthen its position as a field of research. I conclude by arguing that graphic design’s potential contribution to the wider scholarship in the context of mounting pressures on all academic fields to demonstrate “impact” is rooted precisely in the integrated approach that it takes in the production, form, and circulation of knowledge.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.