Abstract

We investigate how processing preferences (i.e., individual tendencies for attending to and utilizing different types of information) influence the evaluation of crowdfunding campaigns. We illustrate that a preference for analytical processing may lead to less favorable evaluations, while a preference for heuristic processing or affective processing may result in more favorable evaluations. A randomized correlational study generally supports these predictions, and also pinpoints areas for future research.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call