Abstract
Language-emotion link has been a subject of interest for several decades. It has been studied extensively both in the monolingual and bilingual literature. However, due to the numerous factors that are at play in bilingualism, i.e. age and context of acquisition, frequency of use, there is conflicting evidence regarding the emotional load of each language of bilinguals. A great bulk of evidence leans towards the L1 as the more emotional language. This study investigates the perceived emotionality in the late learned language. Our participants (N = 57) were late bilinguals who learned their second language (English) in formal contexts after their first language (Turkish). We used a lexical decision task in which the participants determined whether the visually presented emotion words were real words or non-words. In line with the literature, we report faster response times for positive than for negative words in both languages. Also, the results showed L1 superiority in word processing.
Highlights
ВступBilingualism is influenced by a variety of factors such as age of acquisition (AoA) of the languages, context of learning, frequency of use of each language
Emotion research in the bilingual literature, has shown that emotional content of language is vulnerable to age affects, when the second language is learnt through formal education (Caldwell-Harris, Sanches & Nayaka, 2014; Chen, Lin, Chen, Lu & Guo, 2015; Ong, Hussein, Chow & Thompson, 2017)
The results showed that positive words (M=530.65, SD=101.49) in both languages were processed faster than negative words (M=576.44, SD=107.92)
Summary
Bilingualism is influenced by a variety of factors such as age of acquisition (AoA) of the languages, context of learning, frequency of use of each language. Emotion research in the bilingual literature, has shown that emotional content of language is vulnerable to age affects, when the second language is learnt through formal education (Caldwell-Harris, Sanches & Nayaka, 2014; Chen, Lin, Chen, Lu & Guo, 2015; Ong, Hussein, Chow & Thompson, 2017). It is maintained that proficiency level or length and amount of exposure may compensate for the age and context of acquisition effects (Grabitz, Watkins & Bishop, 2016; Kazanas & Altarriba, 2016; Ong, Hussain, Chow & Thompson, 2017)
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
