Abstract
This study tested the predictions of three major hypotheses of relative clause acquisition in second language acquisition: Keenan and Comrie's (1977) Noun Phrase Accessibility Hierarchy (NPAH), Kuno's (1974) Perceptual Difficulty Hypothesis (PDH), and Hamilton's (1994) SO Hierarchy Hypothesis (SOHH). These hypotheses are based on different rationales and make different predictions on the difficulty order of different relative clause sentence types. Analyses of the data collected from 61 learners of English as a second language in three different elicitation tasks found mixed support for the NPAH and the SOHH and full support for the PDH. Generally, the results suggest a complementary relationship between the NPAH and the PDH. Some differences observed in different tasks point to the importance of examining learners' processing problems in multiple tasks in different modalities.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.