Abstract

ABSTRACTWaste polyurethane foam (w‐PU) and waste ethylene–vinyl acetate foam (w‐EVA) were used as fillers for the production of an ethylene–vinyl acetate (EVA) blend foam. Two different foaming techniques (single‐stage and heat–chill processes) were used for this purpose. The waste foam concentration was varied up to 30 wt % of the original EVA. The physical, mechanical, and morphological properties of the filled foam were studied. The single‐stage process produced blend foams with a lower density and a greater cell size than the foams obtained by the heat–chill process. The density and compression strength of the blend foam increased as the percentage of w‐PU foam increased. However, for the w‐EVA/EVA blend foams, the addition of w‐EVA foam did not significantly affect the density or compression strength compared to the original EVA foams. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2017, 134, 44708.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call