Abstract
The aim of the paper deals with the preliminary verification of D. Gile’s (2009) hypothesis (Effort Model) concerning the dependence of the translation quality not only on the command of the two languages involved, but also on the degree of the translator’s or interpreter’s processing mechanism saturation.
 The methods of the research included a comparative analysis of two target texts (English) translated by the same subjects from the same non-fiction source text (Ukrainian) related to the domain of law. The said source text was first rendered into English orally (sight translation) and then translated in the written form within a predetermined time limit. The subjects, first-year MA students majoring in Translation, whose command of English ranged between B2 and C1 levels within the CEF classification, were properly motivated to achieve the maximum possible result. The analysis of both English target texts (oral and written) was based on a number of parameters, which included the preservation of the source text information in the target texts, their grammar and lexical accuracy, as well as their coherence. The sight translation analysis additionally assessed fluency, while the written translation – orthographic control.
 Results. It was established that the preservation of the source text information in the target texts is equally high in both types of translation. The same is generally true concerning their grammar and lexical accuracy as well. A slight growth of the number of mistakes in the article use and an insignificant amount of more elementary errors, non-compatible with the subjects’ level of English, may be accounted for by the restricted monitoring capacity in sight translation due to the processing mechanism saturation. By coherence criterion, the sight translation target text does not meet the requirements of the B2+ level the written translation target text belongs to. In some fragments, it slides down to level B1 or even A2, especially in relation to fluency, whose quality is often deteriorated by unmotivated pauses, false starts, repetitions, self-corrections and reformulations.
 Conclusions. The authors suggest an assumption that the said deterioration in sight translation is accounted for by a higher degree of simultaneous efforts concentration in it as compared with the written translation. The paper outlines the prospects of further research.
Highlights
The interlingual translation process investigation is important for understanding the brain functioning in general, the nature of the language-related processes, as well as for an efficient control of the translation competence development in translator and interpreter training
We may assume that in the written translation the individual’s processing capacity is rarely saturated, because this type of translation is essentially discrete. i.e. the efforts related to the source text reception, its analysis, decision making and the target text production are applied sequentially, That is why the available processing capacity is usually enough to provide for the acceptable quality of translation
In contrast to the written translation, the level of effort cumulation per unit of time in the sight translation substantially increases and it results in the translation quality deterioration
Summary
The interlingual translation process investigation is important for understanding the brain functioning in general, the nature of the language-related processes, as well as for an efficient control of the translation competence development in translator and interpreter training. This kind of research has been conducted for quite a while, beginning with W. In spite of a considerable amount of research, the problem remains to be important due to the lack of a comprehensive model of translation/interpreting, both in general and concerning each of their types
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
