Abstract
In recent years, also in connection with Covid-19 pandemics and enforced restrictions, there has been the formation of large industrial corporations gathering separate companies with similar, sometimes complementary production profiles. This evolving trend has brought usually positive economic effects; however, it has also created some integration problems that include the process safety management. The Texas City BP accident in 2005 and its tremendous human and economic losses underlined the obstacles in defining a well-structured corporation process safety management. The main causes of the above-mentioned accident were connected to an inadequate safety culture at the managerial level. Strong leadership and high standards of corporate governance are required to inspire correct safety behavior in the staff. The so-called soft skills become even more important in the Industry 4.0 arena, where the foundation of the whole system is based on an intelligent use and interpretation of data. The importance of this aspect is confirmed by several post-accidental analyses of past events. Although some research on this topic has been already done, it is worth it to dedicate some effort to identifying specific factors which influence the corporate process safety management quality, and, once identified, to assess them. This paper applies the concept of “lessons learnt” for the identification of organizational and managerial aspects worth consideration in process safety management. Based on accident and literature reviews and expert opinions, the aim is to identify the major contributing factors among leadership and safety culture, risk awareness, knowledge and competence, communication, and information and decision-making processes. To self-assess the level of commitment of the top leaders in process safety management, a checklist approach is proposed, combined with a quantitative, weighted evaluation based on the Relative Efficiency Indicator (REI). Positive value of REI may ensure the effectiveness of process safety management in major hazard industries and their appropriate adaptation to the corporation community. The proposed method, which is validated in an actual case study, underlines the importance of an appropriate education, and of a more careful selection of HSE managers.
Highlights
This paper addresses specific aspects of corporate safety management that need to be considered by corporate management in process safety
As a main limitation of the approach, it should be evidenced that the list of components is not exhaustive because it does not include other factors explicitly required in process safety management systems but addresses only those that are relevant at the corporate management level
As recently reported [57], cause accident analysis evidences the crucial role between risk controls and the Safety Management System in activities like hazardous material transport via pipeline not included under the umbrella of Seveso Directives aiming at preventing major accidents at industrial facilities
Summary
The reports on the major process accidents, the detailed analysis of some events as well as the results from Seveso inspections in several industrial plants [6] were used to identify the essential safety-related aspects at the managerial level. The analysis of the above-mentioned sources allows the identification of six fundamental factors, which may drive effective performance of top managers for developing a corporate community whose aim is to ensure process and personnel safety and sustainability. Bragatto et al [13] outlined a novel framework based on the bowtie model to improve the practical implementation of SMS in small-sized enterprises, while in [14] it is evidenced the relevant role of managerial and organizational factors in developing risk analysis studies addressing risk-based decisions.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary 
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
