Abstract

While the new generation of chemical vapor deposition (CVD) tools adapts NF/sub 3/ as a chamber clean gas to reduce perfluorocompound (PFC) reductions, process optimization (C/sub 2/F/sub 6/) and alternative C/sub x/F/sub y/ clean chemistries are options for the installed-base tools. From a previous study comparing the various C/sub x/F/sub y/ chamber clean chemistries, we further conducted a production test in a 150-mm wafer fabrication facility comparing the best alternative C/sub x/F/sub y/ clean chemistry (C/sub 4/F/sub 8/ clean) with an optimized C/sub 2/F/sub 6/ clean process on a Novellus Concept 1 Dielectric tool running TEOS-based SiO/sub 2/ CVD. Gas flow rates, chamber pressure, and oxygen volume percentages were studied as variables to develop an optimal c-C/sub 4/F/sub 8/ process recipe for maintaining or improving cleaning efficiency while reducing gas consumption and PFC emissions compared to the optimized C/sub 2/F/sub 6/ process. After the initial experimental matrix was completed, several single-variable experiments were run to fine tune the recipe. Based on the data analysis and the model results from the design of experiment, two optimal C/sub 4/F/sub 8/ cleaning processes were identified. Both processes significantly lowered gas consumption and PFC emissions. Marathon process testing showed no adverse impact on film properties or device yield.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.