Abstract

Purpose This study aimed to perform a process evaluation of a participatory supportive return to work program for workers without a (permanent) employment contract, sick-listed due to a common mental disorder. The program consisted of a participatory approach, integrated care and direct placement in a competitive job. Our main questions were: were these components realized in practice and in accordance with the protocol? The evaluation took place alongside a randomized controlled trial. Methods The study population consisted of workers who filed a sickness benefit claim at the Dutch Social Security Agency, professionals of this agency and of vocational rehabilitation agencies. We focused on sick-listed workers and professionals who had actually participated in the intervention. Data was collected mainly by questionnaires. Results Only 36 out of 94 intervention group participants started with the program. In half of these cases application of integrated care was reported. Most other steps in the program were completed. However, fidelity to the protocol was low to reasonable. Much delay was observed in the execution of the program and only two sick-listed workers were placed in a competitive job. Still, satisfaction with the participatory approach was good. Conclusions Despite the positive evaluation of the participatory approach, the full program was executed less successfully compared to similar programs evaluated in earlier studies. This will probably affect the outcomes of our trial. Findings from this study will help to interpret these outcomes. Nevertheless, more knowledge is needed about experiences of stakeholders who participated in the program. Trial Registration NTR3563.

Highlights

  • IntroductionSick-listed workers without a (permanent) employment contract, such as sick-listed unemployed workers, temporary agency workers and workers with an expired fixedterm employment contract, often face more obstacles for return to work (RTW) compared to sick-listed employees, especially when there is no (longer a) workplace to return to [1, 2]

  • Sick-listed workers without a employment contract, such as sick-listed unemployed workers, temporary agency workers and workers with an expired fixedterm employment contract, often face more obstacles for return to work (RTW) compared to sick-listed employees, especially when there is no workplace to return to [1, 2]

  • We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of this program, compared to usual occupational health care (OHC), in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) [6]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Sick-listed workers without a (permanent) employment contract, such as sick-listed unemployed workers, temporary agency workers and workers with an expired fixedterm employment contract, often face more obstacles for return to work (RTW) compared to sick-listed employees, especially when there is no (longer a) workplace to return to [1, 2]. Mental health problems are frequent reasons for sickness absence within this group [3]. As both the nonpermanent employment rate and the absolute number of unemployed workers have increased during the last decade [4, 5], RTW of these workers is a growing concern. The program combines a participatory approach, in which the sick-listed worker is encouraged to develop an action plan for RTW, direct placement in a competitive job and integrated care. In the absence of an employer, the Dutch Social Security Agency (SSA) is responsible for RTW guidance of sick-listed workers who have no (longer an) employment contract. Vocational rehabilitation agencies were contracted in order to support the sick-listed workers in searching for a suitable (competitive) workplace

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call