Abstract

Chemical looping gasification (CLG) is a novel gasification technique, allowing for the production of a nitrogen-free high calorific synthesis gas from solid hydrocarbon feedstocks, without requiring a costly air separation unit. Initial advances to better understand the CLG technology were made during first studies in lab and bench scale units and through basic process simulations. Yet, tailored process control strategies are required for larger CLG units, which are not equipped with auxiliary heating. Here, it becomes a demanding task to achieve autothermal CLG operation, for which stable reactor temperatures are obtained. This study presents two avenues to attain autothermal CLG behavior, established through equilibrium based process simulations. As a first approach, the dilution of active oxygen carrier materials with inert heat carriers to limit oxygen transport to the fuel reactor has been investigated. Secondly, the suitability of restricting the air flow to the air reactor in order to control the oxygen availability in the fuel reactor was examined. Process simulations show that both process control approaches facilitate controlled and de-coupled heat and oxygen transport between the two reactors of the chemical looping gasifier, thus allowing for efficient autothermal CLG operation. With the aim of inferring general guidelines on how CLG units have to be operated in order to achieve decent synthesis gas yields, different advantages and disadvantages associated to the two suggested process control strategies are discussed in detail and optimization avenues are presented.

Highlights

  • The reduction of greenhouse gas emissions (GHGE) in order to reach the unilateral goals agreed upon in the UNFCCC Paris Agreement is one of the major challenges of civilization in the 21st century.While notable advances in the energy sector have been achieved in recent years [1,2], the de-carbonization of the transport sector, which is responsible for almost one quarter of the European GHGE emissions [3]and consumes 36% of the global final energy [1], signifies a key issue on the path to a closed carbon cycle.Especially the replacement of conventional fuels in the heavy freight transport and aviation industry, where electrification is currently not viable, remains a major hurdle

  • The critical parameter is the so called air-to-fuel equivalence ratio given by the ratio of oxygen fed to the air reactor (AR), mO,AR, and the oxygen required for full feedstock combustion, mO,stoich :

  • Due to the dissection of the gasification/combustion reaction into two separate reactors in chemical looping processes, there is no direct contact between the air entering the AR and the fuel entering the fuel reactor (FR)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The reduction of greenhouse gas emissions (GHGE) in order to reach the unilateral goals agreed upon in the UNFCCC Paris Agreement is one of the major challenges of civilization in the 21st century. Equation (9)), leading to a full conversion of the deployed feedstock [23,25] The latter reaction is generally undesired, as a high carbon conversion is targeted inside the FR, in order to maximize the carbon capture efficiency of the process [23,26,27]. Fischer-Tropsch fuels) in process chains employing CLG for syngas generation, this means that up to 65% of the carbon contained in the feedstock can be captured and stored, constituting negative. Sci. 2020, 10, x FOR PEER REVIEW third of the carbon contained in the feedstock is transferred into the valorized end-product (e.g., liquid Fischer-Tropsch fuels) in process chains employing CLG for syngas generation, this means that up to 65% of the carbon contained in the feedstock can be captured and stored, constituting negative emissions in case biogenic feedstocks are being employed.

To round off these be introduced strategies in Section are
Description
Flow sheet of of the the Aspen
Decomposer
Boundary Conditions
Attaining CLG Behavior
Different
Reduction of OC Circulation
Simulation results for CLG
Dilution of OC with Inert Bed Material
Simulation results for dilution inertinert
Reduction of Air-to-Fuel Equivalence Ratio
Optimizing CLG Efficiency
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call