Process and Product Innovation: Complementarity in a Vertically Differentiated Monopoly with Discrete Consumer Types

Abstract

The publisher wishes to draw attention to errors in the following articles: 1. Bandyopadhyay S. and R. Acharyya (2004) “Process and product innovation: complementarity in a vertically differentiated monopoly with discrete consumer types”, The Japanese Economic Review, Vol. 55(2), pp. 175–200. The Acknowledgements should read as follows: We are grateful to two anonymous referees for their comments that have led to substantial improvement in the quality of the paper. We also thank Akira Okada, Co-Editor and the Associated Editor in-charge at the time of acceptance, for encouraging us to revise the paper. Earlier versions of the paper were presented at the 2001 Far Eastern Meeting of the Econometric Society held at Kobe University, Japan, in 2001, and at the Winter School in Quantities Economics at the Indian Institute of Management, Calcutta, in January 2001. Thanks are due to Vincenzo Denicolo, Tarun Kabiraj, and Paul Klemperer for their comments and suggestions. The usual disclaimer applies, however. 2. Chaudhuri S. and M. R. Gupta (2004) “Child labour and trade liberalization”, The Japanese Economic Review, Vol. 55(2), pp. 201–211. The Acknowledgements should read as follows: This is a revised version of the paper entitled “Incidence of Child Labour, Free Education Policy and Trade Liberalization in a Developing Economy” by Sarbajit Chaudhuri. The authors are highly indebted to an anonymous referee of this Journal for his / her interesting comments on the earlier version of the paper. Constructive comments from Professor Sajal Lahiri are also gratefully acknowledged. However, the usual disclaimer applies. The publisher apologises for the errors and any inconvenience they may have caused.