Abstract
The preoccupation of this essay is with the difficulties that have confronted judges throughout the Commonwealth in sustaining a purely results-based account of their role in reviewing public authority compatibility with human rights. Ultimately, in each of the jurisdictions to have adopted the so-called Commonwealth model of human rights protection, process-based considerations have insinuated themselves into the judicial supervision of administrative decision-making – albeit in strikingly different ways. This essay examines relevant developments in four jurisdictions – the United Kingdom, the State of Victoria, Canada and New Zealand.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
