Abstract
Process intensification (PI) has the potential to significantly reduce capital and operating costs in post-combustion CO2 capture using monoethanolamine (MEA) solvent for power plants. The intensified absorber using rotating packed bed (RPB) was modelled based on Aspen Plus® rate-based model, but some build-in correlations in Aspen Plus® rate-based model were replaced with new correlations suitable for RPB. These correlations reflect centrifugal acceleration which is present in RPB. The new correlations were implemented in visual FORTRAN as sub-routines and were dynamically linked to Aspen Plus® rate based model. The model for intensified absorber was validated using experimental data and showed good agreement. Process analysis carried out indicates: (a) CO2 capture level increases with rotating speed. (b) Higher lean MEA inlet temperature leads to higher CO2 capture level. (c) Increase in lean MEA concentration results in increase in CO2 capture level. (d) Temperature bulge is not present in intensified absorber. Compared with conventional absorber using packed columns, the insights obtained from this study are (1) intensified absorber using RPB improves mass transfer significantly. (2) Higher flue gas temperature or lean MEA temperature will not be detrimental to the reactive separation as such cooling duty for flue gas can be saved. (3) Inter-cooling cost will not be incurred since there is no temperature bulge. A detail comparison between conventional absorber and intensified absorber using RPB was carried out and absorber volume reduction factor of 12 times was found. These insights can be useful for design and operation of intensified absorber for CO2 capture.
Highlights
Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions have become a concern for the global community in the 21st century
The results show that CO2 capture level increases with increase in rotor speed for both 20.9 ◦C and 39.5 ◦C lean MEA temperatures due to enhanced mass transfer
The results show that CO2 capture level increases significantly from 25 ◦C to 50 ◦C lean MEA temperatures
Summary
Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions have become a concern for the global community in the 21st century. Dugas (2006) carried out experimental study of post-combustion CO2 capture in the context of fossil fuel-fired power plants. Lawal et al (2009a,b, 2010) carried out dynamic modelling of CO2 absorption for post-combustion capture in coal-fired power plants. In these studies, one of the identified challenges to the commercial roll out of the technology has been the large size of the packed columns needed. PI has the potential to meet this challenge (Reay, 2008)
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
