Abstract
Professor Paul Brand draws attention to an error in the report of a meeting of the Orthopaedic Section of the Association of Surgeons of India submitted to this journal and published in our issue of May 1962. The observations then reported were not made by him but in his absence by another contributor. The particular paragraph to which Professor Brand wishes to draw attention read: "Lately he had been using a wrist flexor tendon as the motor unit for the transplant, instead of the extensor carpi ulnaris, and he felt that the flexor tendon was the better." Professor Brand writes: "I have not been using a wrist flexor tendon as the motor unit. I used one many years ago, and found it is very definitely inferior. I have never used the extensor carpi ulnaris. I assume that the sentence should have read: ‘Lately he has been using the extensor carpi radialis longus as the motor unit for the transplant instead of the extensor carpi radialis brevis, and has taken the graft around the radial side of the forearm and through the carpal tunnel to reach the lumbrical insertions along the lumbrical canals. He found the results were better with this method.’"
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.