Abstract
Subject Contextualization: It examines the procedural formalism from a logical-formal structure. Furthermore, it analyzes the possibility of judicial creativity regarding procedure in structural processes. It also permeates the process as a guarantee against discretion and its maintenance as a delimited discursive field.
 Objectives: The main purpose of this article is to analyze process flexibility in cases of structural disputes, based on the proposal of the process as a guarantee institution, from which proceduralism derives.
 Methodology: For that, it uses a bibliographic-documentary analysis, using the deductive method, to infer the conclusions.
 Results: It is concluded that the legal and discretionary review of process and procedure intitutions is not valid, even in conflicts otherwise classified as structural.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
