Abstract

AbstractControl structure (strategy) selection consists of the selection and pairing of manipulated and measured variables. This article outlines a procedure that uses such tools as the existence of right half plane (RHP) transmission zeros, the relative gain array, the performance relative gain array, and the closed‐loop disturbance gain. The regulatory control system for the fluid catalytic cracking process is used as an example. Several authors found the Kurihara control structure to be preferable to the conventional control structure. The reason is that RHP transmission zeros limit the achievable bandwidth for the conventional control structure. Two other control structures, however, have better controllability characteristics than both the conventional and the Kurihara control structures. The sensitivity of the measurement selection and variable pairing with respect to changes in the operating point and parametric uncertainty is examined, as well as the general objectives of the regulatory control level and its interaction with the higher levels in the control hierarchy.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call