Abstract
Analyses on the limits of EU internal market law mainly focus on substantive evolutions regarding the underlying concepts. However, once the European Court of Justice (ECJ) has clarified the scope of the free movement principles, the ball is then passed to the national judiciary. In the future application of these boundaries, the judicial dialogue remains crucial to ensure an effective and correct implementation of EU law. This interaction is based on a set of procedural guidelines. Whereas such rules might appear as fixed circumstances, this article will demonstrate how the ECJ – through different dynamics – ensures the correct interaction between substantive and procedural evolutions. This ‘procedural customization’ will be uncovered regarding two central limits of EU internal market law: de minimis thresholds, and the purely internal situation doctrine. internal market law, field of application, limits, de minimis, purely internal situation, preliminary references, European Court of Justice, procedural customization
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
