Abstract

ObjectiveInflammatory markers such as C-reactive protein and procalcitonin have been shown to be independent markers of cardiovascular diseases. We aimed to assess the correlation between serum levels of procalcitonin, C-reactive protein and cardiovascular risk in type 2 diabetes.MethodsWe carried out a cross-sectional study at a tertiary level reference hospital in Yaounde, Cameroon. We assessed the cardiovascular risk using the Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease: Preterax and Diamicron-MR Controlled Evaluation (ADVANCE) cardiovascular risk prediction model in 80 adults with type 2 diabetes. Serum procalcitonin and C-reactive protein were measured in 80 and 76 subjects respectively, using a highly sensitive quantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method. Correlations were examined using Spearman’s rank correlation test and the correlation coefficients were compared using the Z-test statistic.ResultsFemales represented the majority of the study population (62.5%). The median duration of diabetes was 5 (3-10) years and 62.5% of participants had a high cardiovascular risk score. Median serum procalcitonin levels was significantly higher in females compared to male participants: 2.48 (1.76-3.01 ng/mL) vs 1.42 (0.86-1.87 ng/mL); p<0.001. There was no difference in the serum C-reactive protein levels between females and males: 1.20 (0.33-3.33) mg/L vs 0.85 (0.36-2.77) mg/L; p=0.669. Procalcitonin was moderately correlated with cardiovascular risk (r=0.58, p<0.001). The correlation was slightly higher in females (R=0.56, p<0.001) versus males (R=0.49, p=0.005) although not significantly different (Z-statistic=0.734, p=0.463). Serum C-reactive protein did not show a meaningful correlation with cardiovascular risk (R=0.23, p=0.050). At a threshold of 2 ng/ml, serum procalcitonin identified participants with a high cardiovascular risk score, with a sensitivity and specificity of 64% and 80% respectively.ConclusionCompared to C-reactive protein, procalcitonin may be a better surrogate marker for cardiovascular risk prediction in this population with type 2 diabetes.

Highlights

  • Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a metabolic disorder characterized by chronic hyperglycemia secondary to insulinoresistance and secondary insulinopenia

  • All participants involved in the study received individual results slips for PCT and high-sensitivity CRP (hsCRP) followed by a short discussion to explain the meaning of the results

  • Results from this study show that serum PCT moderately correlates with cardiovascular risk while serum hsCRP showed no meaningful correlation in this group of patients with type 2 diabetes

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a metabolic disorder characterized by chronic hyperglycemia secondary to insulinoresistance and secondary insulinopenia. Models developed to quantify the future risk of cardiovascular events are commonly used in clinical practice in order to improve the early detection and management of those at increased risk [3,4]. Examples of some commonly clinically relevant prediction models include the Framingham, QRISK, SCORE (Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation) and ADVANCE (Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease: Preterax and Diamicron-MR Controlled Evaluation) cardiovascular risk scores [5]. These models provide an objective basis for risk stratification by combining multiple predictors in a mathematical formula to estimate the risk of developing a cardiovascular outcome. There is a push to identify simpler methods of cardiovascular risk stratification and the use of inflammatory markers in predicting future cardiovascular events is increasingly becoming standard practice

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call