Problems with prostheses on implants: A retrospective study

Abstract

Prosthetic parameters for implant success have not been well defined but should include patient satisfaction and prosthesis maintenance, including adjustments and repairs. In addition, differences between fixed and removable implant-supported prostheses (ISPs) should be quantified. This study retrospectively evaluated both patient satisfaction and maintenance for 156 patients. Removable ISPs averaged almost three times as many adjustments per prosthesis (2.1 versus 0.8 per fixed ISP) and more than twice as many repairs (1.9 per removable ISP versus 0.9 per fixed ISP). The most common adjustments were to the contour of both types of prosthesis, and the most frequent repairs involved the retentive clips with removable ISPs and the gold screws with fixed ISPs. The incidence of repeat repairs was more than twice as high with removable prostheses compared with fixed prostheses. However, the repairs to opposing dentures most often needed were for conventional dentures opposing fixed ISPs. The vast majority of repairs were needed within the first year of service. Despite the high maintenance needed, patients were satisfied with both types of ISP, with the exception of limited satisfaction with cleansability, particularly with fixed restorations. The high incidence of early repairs, and the greater potential for a removable ISP requiring adjustment and repair, should be considered both when discussing options with the patient and when estimating treatment and maintenance costs before the commencement of implant therapy.