Abstract
Introduction. The relevance of the research is due to the modern transformation of the institute of state youth policy, the change in its functions, and the need to reflect on the results of outgoing forms of administration and work with youth. Based on the conducted research, the article assesses the satisfaction of young people with the organization of the main measures to support all of their life strategies implemented by the governing bodies in the field of state youth policy. Materials and Methods. The results of a survey of young people aged 16 to 30, conducted in the Belgorod Region in 2020-2021, were used as the research materials. Based on the developed tools, including using online forms, 866 respondents were interviewed; students and working youth were interviewed through a street survey. The uniformity of diagnostics for each life strategy made it possible to obtain a comparative evaluation matrix in all areas of the state youth policy. Results. Regional Russian youth have given a reflexive assessment of the key problematic points in the implementation of the state youth policy and youth support; their interest in and the potential of involvement in activities and projects related to youth issues have been revealed. A map of youth satisfaction with the activities proposed by the governing bodies in the field of the state youth policy has been drawn. Discussion and Conclusion. The youth satisfaction with the situation that exists today in the field of state youth policy management is assessed as quite low, which makes it possible to conclude that the proposed measures are insufficiently effective and to raise the question of proposing new formats and strategies for developing work with youth. The research materials may be in demand by state youth policy administration bodies, state and municipal government bodies, youth organizations, and educational institutions. The data obtained can be a scientific increment for sectoral sociology (sociology of youth) in the methodological and demonstrative terms.
Highlights
International experience shows that social innovation is an important tool for regional development, this type of innovation is a relatively new phenomenon for Russia
Its key factor is innovation, which, in turn, is determined by the availability of sufficient amount of human capital, it being a set of knowledge, skills and abilities, including the ability of a person to generate ideas, create innovations, and bring them to production
The theoretical foundations of the study include the works of Russian and foreign academic economists, generalization and critical analysis of which made it possible to show the indirect impact of human capital on sustainable development
Summary
The factors in the liquidation orientation of the institution of insolvency in the Russian Federation, as well as the trends in the increase in duration of insolvency proceedings with a minimum number of satisfied creditor claims have been identified; counterarguments have been presented regarding the alleged low efficiency of trustees in bankruptcy; arguments concerning the annual increase in the workload of trustees in bankruptcy have been statistically supported. 126 Федерального закона «О несостоятельности (банкротстве)»); б) препятствование проведению инвентаризации; в) обжалование результатов оценки, обращение в арбитражный суд с заявлениями о разрешении разногласий в части порядка реализации имущества должника; г) включение аффилированных лиц в реестр требований кредиторов должника с целью аккумулирования большинства голосов для контроля над процедурой; д) попытки приостановления торгов, оспаривание результатов торгов, жалобы в Федеральную антимонопольную службу Российской Федерации; е) жалобы на действия арбитражного управляющего, давление на него посредством подачи жалоб в Управление Росреестра с целью отстранения от процедуры или же полной дисквалификации управляющего; ‒ величина и разнородность конкурсной массы, что приводит к необходимости организации нескольких длительных процедур торгов; ‒ комплексный и ресурсозатратный характер деятельности арбитражного управляющего по оспариванию подозрительных сделок должника с последующей реализацией возвращенных в конкурсную массу активов или прав требования к третьим лицам; ‒ юридической работой по привлечению к субсидиарной ответственности контролирующих лиц должника. Результаты исследования представляют интерес для арбитражных управляющих, специалистов, сопровождающих процедуры банкротства, а также студентов факультетов экономического и юридического профилей, поскольку включают в себя не только обширный статистический анализ эффективности института несостоятельности в его действующем состоянии, но и сравнительный анализ законопроекта изменений в Федеральный закон «О несостоятельности (банкротстве)» с точки зрения профессионального положения арбитражных управляющих.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
