Problems of geological and isotopic age of the Okhotsk-Chukotsk Volcanogenic Belt (OCVB)

Abstract

The working stratigraphic chart accepted for the Okhotsk-Chukotsk Volcanogenic Belt (OCVB) at the 3rd Interdepartmental Regional Stratigraphic Conference (IRSC) integrated data of the medium-scale geological survey, the established succession of endemic floras of the developing volcanic highland, and the results of palynological and magnetostratigraphic study (Resolutions of the 3rd…, 2003). The OCVB was formed during the middle Albian-Santonian (and initial Campanian probably). Sequences of the belt are attributed to the Buor-Kemyus (early-middle Albian), Arman (late Albian), Amka (Cenomanian), and Arkagala (Turonian-Santonian) phytostratigraphic horizons. The lack of data on relations between the horizons and fauna-bearing marine deposits is a serious obstacle for correlation of regional subdivisions with the general stratigraphic scale. The problem can be solved using geological methods of palynological and tephrochronological research. Isotopic ages of the OCVB rocks were determined applying the K-Ar and Rb-Sr isotopic dating in the early period and the Ar-Ar and U-Pb (SHRIMP) methods in recent years. The subdivision scheme of the OCVB volcanics based on the K-Ar relict and Rb-Sr isochron dates, which is accepted as addendum to the working stratigraphic chart, confirms in general the geological inferences concerning the OCVB age. The Ar-Ar and U-Pb dates (less than 100 determinations in total) obtained for the Okhotsk, Central Chukotsk, and Anadyr sectors of the OCVB external zone provoked opinions that the belt age should be radically revised. Analysis of new isotopic dates showed that they contradict in variable extent to geological data on the Okhotsk and Central Chukotsk sectors, whereas there is no significant discordance between isotopic and geological data on the Anadyr sector. Consequently, it can be empirically concluded that geological factors influenced the isotopic systems (“clock”). There is also a considerable discordance between the Ar-Ar and U-Pb isotopic dates. These uncertainties of the isotopic dating imply prematurity of idea to revise age of the OCVB.