Problems of compatibility of specificities of human values system, business, state and society

Abstract

Two forms of relations of the state economic authority with the economic agents areanalyzed: 1) paternalism and 2) free cooperation, the role of economic governance performed in relationto the state economic agents. The development trend of institutions that appear between the stateand individual private owners and begin to perform the function of economic mediator, carrier of localinterests, representative in state government bodies is analyzed. This trend is titled corporatism, and itsmodern variant is neo-corporatism. It is noted that the prevailing type of socio-economic thinking affectsthe system of social partnership. Three behavioral stereotypes are possible in the public mentality: a)in dominance-subordination relations, b) in the system of confrontation (power relation/confrontation)c) in cooperative relations (cooperation). While discussing t the problems, attention is payed on the followingissues: 1) formation of civil society and degree of development of corporatism; 2) tripartism andproblems of establishing social-labor relations; 3) ways to overcome the “economy of natural persons”;4) The concept of a new public agreement between the government and civil society. The question ofthe relationship between paternalism and private initiative is analyzed, the analysis of the results of thesocio-economic attitude research in Georgia is presented.