Abstract
In a recent issue of this Journal, Hosek states that the purpose of his paper is to question [the] common usage of historical data in making projections or extrapolations about future earnings growth paths and future interest rates. '1 For past data to be used to project future interest and earning growth rates, the historical time series must be stationary -invariant with respect to time. Autocorrelation functions 'for levels of interest rates and for percent changes of wage rates are presented. Hosek finds that these autocorrelation functions . tend to behave more like those for nonstationary series rather than stationary series. 2 His major conclusion . is that the uncritical use of historical averages and relationships provides a weak basis for estimating future growth rates in income and future rates of interest .3 Further, he states that the nonstationarity problem is apparent in the simplified approach which relies on the close historical relationship between nominal earnings increases and nominal interest rates to calculate future lost earnings.4 Hosek transforms the nominal wage and interest rate time series data into ordinary first differences and states that their autocorrelation functions look like those for stationary time series. I Box-Pierce Q statistics are also calculated in order to test, at the 5% level, the hypothesis that autocorre-
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.