Abstract
Abstract Since forest acreage is limited, provision of material needs conflicts with aspirations for environmental quality. In debating national policy, Congress should consider that designating some sites for timber growing would be just as reasonable as setting others apart for wilderness. The various claims on the available acreage must be brought into balance without transferring the problem from public lands to private ones.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.