Problems and possible solutions for therapy with statins.

Abstract

Despite issues about the value of statins, benefit for high cardiovascular (CV) risk outweighs problems. However, the practitioner must be aware of concerns, be prepared to respond, and justify statin usage. Symptoms of statin-related myopathy are of more concern than stated by pharmaceutical companies. Occurrence of myopathy symptoms, estimated to be up to 10.4%, can decrease statin adherence of high CV risk patients. Dosage modification, or use of pitavastatin, may help the problematic patient. There are concerns that there may be little benefit of statins for primary prevention in women. However, evidence appears to support statin use in women at high CV risk, both in primary and secondary prevention. Abandoning low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) as a valid target is unwarranted; there is much evidence to support "lower is better." The practitioner must be aware of the complicated processes causing atherosclerosis and when to incorporate new approaches to disease management. Tailoring therapy for CV risk, when indicated, may contribute further to LDL-C reduction. Liver inflammation can occur with statins but is of minimal concern; frequently, statins alleviate the problem. Unless liver transaminases are over three times normal, a statin should be prescribed, if indicated. The net effect of statins on cognition appears to be zero-no harm, no benefit. Despite reports of improved cognition, statins should not be prescribed for this. With diabetes mellitus (DM), statins can increase incidence, but the CV benefit far outweighs any risk. Therefore, statins should be prescribed in DM to reduce CV risk. Statins are a major medical contribution when used appropriately.