Abstract
In 2016 the EPA revised the Exceptional Events Rule of the Clean Air Act (CAA) making important changes to what types of air quality events are considered exceptional. The rule allows “exceptional” air quality events to be excluded from the dataset used to determine air quality violations, specifically attainment and nonattainment. These exclusions allow air quality levels to remain above standards, yet simultaneously appear safe. This policy analysis focuses on the revisions and asks two questions. What are the negative consequences in how the rule defines exceptional events? Does this rule support the primary goal of the CAA? The paper analyzes four exclusion criteria, focuses in on air pollution from dust storms, and draws on a case study of Lamar, Colorado. It returns to the original questions to argue, first, that the rule allows common events to be excluded from the dataset, and second, works against the ultimate goal of the CAA.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
