Abstract

Discipline‐based education research has produced varied perspectives on defining and assessing scientific problem solving. The goals of this dissertation work are to describe and explain longitudinal performance gaps across a two‐year biochemistry curriculum, as well as to synthesize a more advanced pedagogical understanding of scientific problem solving from previously fragmented sources. Student performance will be measured using the Individual Problem Solving Assessment (IPSA), and achievement rates in each domain of problem solving will describe longitudinal performance. The results of a pilot study indicate that after the first year of the curriculum, domain achievement rates for students pursuing a B.S. in Biochemistry range from 9% to 64%. To explain performance gaps, potential contributors will also be investigated, using two additional measures that reflect alternate views of problem solving. The impact of our corresponding problem‐based learning strategies will also be evaluated. Multivariate multiple linear regression analyses will be used to generate quantitative models of the performance phenomena. Additionally, students’ preconceptions about problem solving are being identified. This study will ultimately elucidate connections among emerging theories of defining and assessing scientific problem solving.Research support is provided under NSF TUES Award #DUE‐1043079.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.