Abstract

Accuracy of phase transformation models depends on the correctness of coefficients evaluation, adequate to the investigated material. Dilatometric tests combined with the inverse analysis are used to perform identification. Since the problem is nonlinear, analytical approach is not possible and the inverse solution is transferred into the optimization task. It leads to difficulties typical for optimization of multivariable function such as local minima and lack of proof of the uniqueness. The problem of the effectiveness and uniqueness of the inverse algorithms used for identification of phase transformation models for steels was investigated for two models. The first was a modified JMAK (Johnson–Mehl–Avrami–Kolmogorov) equation. The second was an upgrade of the Leblond equation, in which second-order derivative of the volume fraction with respect to time was introduced. In classical identification, the result for one transformation depends on the coefficients for the remaining transformations and optimization has to be performed several times until the compatibility between transformations is reached. To avoid encountered problems, complex optimization simultaneously for all coefficients in the models was performed. This approach was based on nature-inspired optimization techniques. Models with identified coefficients for various steels were validated in simulations of industrial processes of laminar cooling and continuous annealing of strips.

Highlights

  • Computer-aided design of materials processing is common

  • The inverse algorithm proposed by the authors is described in Ref 8, and application to the phase transformation models is presented in Ref 1, 9, including mathematical background and usage of the sensitivity analysis

  • The new approach based on the nature-inspired optimization algorithms to identification of the phase transformation models was proposed

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Computer-aided design of materials processing is common now. Beyond one-step processes, whole manufacturing chains are simulated. Mathematically advance solutions for phase transformations include derivation of equations that relate parameters of the continuum method to the measurable quantities like interface energy and kinetic coefficient (Ref 6), as well as identification of phase field model (Ref 7). All these approaches lead to computationally complex and costly tasks. The inverse algorithm proposed by the authors is described in Ref 8, and application to the phase transformation models is presented in Ref 1, 9, including mathematical background and usage of the sensitivity analysis This approach leads to Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance. Comparison of various optimization methods and selection of the best method was one of the objectives of the work

Phase Transformation Models
JMAK Model
Model Based on the Control Theory
Inverse Approach
Computing Costs in Multiscale Modeling of Materials Processing
Experiment
C Mn Si Cr P
Case Studies
Laminar Cooling
Intercritical Continuous Annealing
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.