Abstract

With the growing popularity of data analytics and data science in the field of environmental risk management, a formalized Knowledge Discovery via Data Analytics (KDDA) process that incorporates all applicable analytical techniques for a specific environmental risk management problem is essential. In this emerging field, there is limited research dealing with the use of decision support to elicit environmental risk management (ERM) objectives and identify analytical goals from ERM decision makers. In this paper, we address problem formulation in the ERM understanding phase of the KDDA process. We build a DM3 ontology to capture ERM objectives and to inference analytical goals and associated analytical techniques. A framework to assist decision making in the problem formulation process is developed. It is shown how the ontology-based knowledge system can provide structured guidance to retrieve relevant knowledge during problem formulation. The importance of not only operationalizing the KDDA approach in a real-world environment but also evaluating the effectiveness of the proposed procedure is emphasized. We demonstrate how ontology inferencing may be used to discover analytical goals and techniques by conceptualizing Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs) exposure shifts based on a multilevel analysis of the level of urbanization (and related economic activity) and the degree of Socio-Economic Deprivation (SED) at the local neighborhood level. The HAPs case highlights not only the role of complexity in problem formulation but also the need for integrating data from multiple sources and the importance of employing appropriate KDDA modeling techniques. Challenges and opportunities for KDDA are summarized with an emphasis on environmental risk management and HAPs.

Highlights

  • Interest pertaining to the theory and practice of environmental risk management (ERM) analytics and data science has exploded over the past decade

  • How to quantify the chemical exposure to populations of lower socioeconomic status? Our understanding of community vulnerability may be improved by incorporating issues relating to urban sociology, socio-economic status and social epidemiology into the Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs) exposure analysis

  • We addressed several key challenges in providing decision support for problem formulation in the Knowledge Discovery via Data Analytics (KDDA) process

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Interest pertaining to the theory and practice of environmental risk management (ERM) analytics and data science has exploded over the past decade. When describing a KDDA project life cycle or KDDA process, practitioners may adopt traditional KDDM process models in order to translate very technical analytical solutions (such as complex algorithms, matrices, criteria, and so forth) into information that is applicable and relevant to the individual case of ERM This is especially true for KDDA initiatives that center around problem formulation, including the identification and contextualizing of objectives. It is well known that there are limitations on human short-term memory that can affect recall of relevant information concerning both organizational and domain knowledge This fact is important during the problem formulation in the environmental risk management understanding (ERMU) phase of the KDDA process where stakeholders are expected to identify all relevant objectives and define them appropriately.

Problem Formulation in the KDDA Process
A Framework for ERM
Problem
Domain Understanding
Model ERM Objectives
Identify Analytical Techniques and Goals
Ontology for Identifying Analytical Techniques and Goals
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call