Abstract
Ionic liquids (ILs) are liquid salts composed of cations and anions, known for their significant local heterogeneity at the molecular level. To understand the microheterogeneity with regard to their local polarity and local viscosity, we have used two structurally similar but chemically distinguishable fluorescent probes: Nile red (NR), a neutral molecule, and Nile blue sulfate (NBS), a charged molecule. A comparative study of the response of the two probes to the molecular level heterogeneity of ILs is expected to provide a better clarity of understanding regarding the charged polar domain and the uncharged hydrophobic domain of ILs. Towards this, we synthesized two butyrolactam-based protic ionic liquids (PILs), i.e., BTF and BTD, with the same ionic headgroup ([BT]+) and different alkyl tails ([RCOO]-), where {R = H, C11H23}. BTF has no significant hydrophobic domain, whereas BTD has a larger hydrophobic domain. Temperature-dependent fluorescence parameters such as fluorescence intensity, lifetime, and anisotropy were measured for both NR and NBS molecules. The use of a pair of structurally similar but ionically different probes enables differential estimation of parameters like the microviscosity of a domain using the fluorescence anisotropy parameter (r). The absorption and emission spectra of both probe molecules are observed to be blue shifted upon going from BTF to BTD. NR showed a significant blue shift in absorption and emission band maxima. Conversely, NBS exhibited a small wavelength shift, possibly influenced by the preferred location of their charged head group domain. Temperature-dependent rotational relaxation time (θ) of NR in BTD is smaller than that of NBS by 60-70%, indicating that stronger charge-charge interactions exist between the polar domain of BTD and NBS. Moreover, it is observed that the local viscosity of the BTF IL around both probes is similar, whereas there is a considerable difference for the BTD IL. These results are an indication that NBS being charged prefers to locate itself in the charged head group region of the IL, whereas NR being neutral tends to reside both in the hydrophobic domain and in the head group but is predominantly located in the hydrophobic domain.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.